Meta’s fact-checking program ends; Romanian groups discuss its function and Zuckerberg’s claims of bias.
🔗 Read the article on hotnews.ro
[This is an automatically generated summary, for reference only]
Mark Zuckerberg announced Meta would discontinue its fact-checking system, claiming it had become too politically biased and eroded trust. In response, attention turned to global fact-checking organizations. In Romania, Factual.ro (Funky Citizens) and AFP handle this role. HotNews interviewed Elena Calistru of Factual regarding the system’s operation. Factual operates as an independent third-party partner for Meta, providing automated labeling (e.g., false, misleading) on viral content without having the power to remove posts; removal is handled separately under community standards. They clarified that they do not verify opinions but facts, and while some political figures adopt debunked conspiracy theories, fact-checkers address topics long covered by media before Meta’s involvement. Zuckerberg’s claim of bias was met with positive feedback for their work, and Factual noted the distinction between verifying facts and policing ideas. Regarding future changes, they are awaiting official communication from Meta. Separately, an internet lawyer suggested that while community reporting is important, fact-checkers provide a more proactive monitoring system than previous reliance on user reports. Furthermore, Zuckerberg’s announcement reportedly caused a surge in users seeking to delete their Facebook and Instagram accounts.
