US midterms show Republican losses, impacting Trump’s power; experts debate future foreign policy.
🔗 Read the article on elconfidencial.com
[This is an automatically generated summary, for reference only]
The recent midterm elections saw the Republican Party lose control of both chambers, interpreted as a referendum on Donald Trump’s management. Unlike the 2006 election, the war in Iran has been a central campaign issue, with public rejection of continued hostilities. Some analysts are skeptical about major shifts in US foreign policy, suggesting that issues like the Middle East, Russia, or the US-EU relationship may not change drastically. One analyst suggests Trump might be internally limited but externally volatile. With a new Congress in 2027, the president will lack legislative majority, potentially limiting major fiscal or legislative initiatives, and the Congress might investigate Trump for corruption. However, another analyst believes the executive branch retains significant power in foreign and trade policy, noting that Congress did not limit the Bush administration. Regarding Ukraine and Iran, the analyst emphasizes that the economic implications, such as energy and commodity prices, are what should concern people most, especially for Europe. Another expert notes a gap between Trump’s promises and actions, particularly regarding the cost of living, while the Democratic victory is seen as positive for NATO and shared democratic values. Despite legislative support for Ukraine, the president might veto such measures to seek a deal with Russia. Overall, analysts suggest Trump’s peak influence is passing, and the world is learning to manage him, though his volatility remains. While tariffs may not disappear entirely, future elections could bring changes. Populist trends are noted, but the US political system is expected to withstand the Trump era, though his influence is diminishing. European leaders face challenges in determining how to relate to a potentially chaotic US in the coming years.
