Unjustifiably long periods of pre-trial detention in Europe: Hungary is among the worst performers in the EU in this regard

Saturday, Feb 28, 2026

Examines pre-trial detention practices across Europe, highlighting disparities and human rights concerns regarding arbitrary arrests and compensation.

πŸ”— Read the article on hvg.hu


[This is an automatically generated summary, for reference only]

The use of pre-trial detention varies significantly across countries; for example, 55–58% of detainees in Albania are held pre-trial, compared to only 12–13% in Romania, suggesting legal and institutional practices rather than crime rates dictate its application. In Hungary, the justification for pre-trial detention is often formal, and courts rarely consider less restrictive measures like probation or bail, with the European Court of Human Rights finding illegal or disproportionate detentions, especially for asylum seekers. While compensation mechanisms exist in Hungary, their effectiveness is criticized; the 2017 system offered an average monthly payment of 40,000 Hungarian forints for poor prison conditions, but advocates argue the state fails to implement structural reforms mandated by the ECtHR. Similar issues arise in Southeastern Europe where pre-trial detention is often imposed unnecessarily or too easily, leading to abuses and inadequate compensation for procedural violations. Albania provides compensation for unlawful detention based on daily rates (e.g., 2000 Lek per day of detention), though its appellate court is reviewing these amounts due to inflation. The core issue in Hungary is not the high rate of pre-trial detention but the excessively long duration of confinement once it is imposed, as prosecutors and judges tend to view detainees as guilty regardless of innocence, leaving few avenues for compensation. In Bulgaria, pre-trial detention is theoretically exceptional, reserved for flight or obstruction, but is often used as a tool of political or economic pressure, as seen in cases involving local politicians. Bulgarians can sue state institutions for damages, with the prosecutor paying up to 200,000 euros in some cases. Serbia faces concerns regarding systemic discrimination against Roma, leading to high pre-trial detention rates that can last years, and judges often fail to properly justify their decisions, resulting in prolonged detentions without accountability. In Greece, pre-trial detention is also exceptional, with maximum terms varying by offense severity, and alternatives like bail or house arrest are available; compensation requires a final acquittal, typically ranging from 10 to 60 euros per day of detention.


πŸ”— Read the original article

Β© 2026 Pulse - Europe beyond the beat


PULSE is an initiative for cross-border collaborative journalism in Europe co-funded by the European Commission under Grant Agreement n. PO 4500158093.

PULSE is an initiative coordinated by OBCT that has been promoting intensive journalistic cross-border collaborations in Europe since 2024. Its main aim is to help strengthen the European public sphere by reporting on and telling stories from new and diverse perspectives.

At the heart of PULSE are 10 leading national news outlets (Delfi – Lithuania, DenΓ­k Referendum – Czechia, Der Standard – Austria, EfSyn – Greece, El Confidencial – Spain, Gazeta Wyborcza – Poland, HotNews – Romania, HVG – Hungary, Il Sole 24 Ore – Italy, Mediapool – Bulgaria) and three transnational organisations, including OBCT , n-ost and Voxeurop .

Additional outlets and journalists are involved as associate partners, including EUobserver , FΓΈljeton (Denmark), H-Alter (Croatia), Levila (Estonia), Rubryka (Ukraine), and The Journal Investigates (Ireland).

PULSE is driven by a sort of virtual transnational newsroom made up of journalists from all the publications involved. It collaboratively produces new journalistic content on European issues on a daily basis, coming in many different languages. The editorial output amounts to over a thousand publications per year, mostly in article form.

PULSE also runs 4 thematic networks open to any European journalist interested in crucial issues such as EU enlargement, relations between the EU and other global powers, the EU’s green transition, or media and the information society. These networks function as online communities and periodically publish calls for pitches.